Your competitors rank for keywords you've never written a page about
Try this before you read anything else I have to say. Open Google Search Console, look at your top queries, then go pull up your three closest competitors and ask yourself what they're ranking for that you aren't. If you can answer that in under an hour, you're better at this than most business owners.
That gap is the entire product.
We built Evergreen AI to find it and close it automatically. You enter your site and up to three competitors. It maps what they actually rank for, finds the keywords and pages where they're winning and you're absent, builds a content plan out of that gap, writes the articles, and publishes them to your CMS. No keyword research on your end. No briefs to approve. No SEO knowledge required at any point.
Tagline version: outrank your competitors without touching SEO.
Let me get the objection out of the way
Another AI content tool. I know. The category has earned its reputation, and if your instinct is that this is a slop machine with a competitor-analysis skin on it, that's a reasonable instinct.
Here's why it isn't, and it has nothing to do with prompts.
Evergreen AI didn't start as a product. It started as the engine we run SEO on at our agency, Tactycs. Everything it published went out under our name, on client sites, to clients who would have fired us over a single obviously-AI article. That constraint is the only reason this thing is built the way it is.
The article pipeline is 32 discrete steps. Not one generation call with a nice prompt. Thirty-two, including a slop filter that kills output before it reaches a client site. That level of paranoia is expensive and slow and nobody builds it for fun. We built it because our reputation was the thing on the line, not a churn metric.
An AI content tool built by people with no downside risk produces exactly what you'd expect. This one was built by people who had to answer for it on a call every month.
The proof I actually trust
TubTabs is a Canadian hot tub product company and one of our clients. They ran on this engine for twelve months. From their Google Search Console export:
Organic clicks up 650%
Impressions up 1,257%
Average position from 42 to 7
9.5x the number of keywords ranking
One client, one vertical, one year. I'm not going to pretend that's a statistically meaningful sample. It's the reason I believed the engine was worth productizing, and it's real data I can show you rather than a marketing number I made up.
Why we opened it up
Evergreen AI powers the SEO we deliver at our agency, Tactycs. We opened it up so smaller businesses can run the same engine themselves, without needing us in the room.
That's the whole motivation. Tactycs isn't a past life I'm using as a credential, it's the thing still running, and the product is the entry rung. If a business outgrows it and wants people in the room, that's what the managed side is for. Most won't need it.
What you get
$149/mo flat. No credit-based pricing, no per-article metering.
3 competitors tracked continuously
Up to 30 articles per month
Up to 10 page enhancements per month on your existing pages
Publishing to WordPress, Sanity, Shopify, Webflow, Wix and Ghost
Google Search Console connected for real performance data, not estimates
Webhook integration coming for everything else
There's a free tier, and I'll be precise about what it is so nobody signs up expecting more: you get a couple of keywords and one article, written. That's it. It isn't a trial of the full engine and it won't go find your competitors for you. It exists so you can read the output before you take my word on any of this.
Today is the first day this is available to anyone outside our agency.
Where this is at
This is day one publicly. Up to now it has only ever run on sites we manage ourselves, where I could see every article before it went out and fix anything that went sideways. It has never run on a site I don't have my hands on.
That's the honest gap, and I can't close it on my own.
So let me make it a trade instead of a favour.
I've spent this whole post telling you this isn't a slop machine. The free tier writes you one article. Read it, then tell me where it falls down, in the comments or by email, and be specific. In return I'll do the thing I normally bill for: I'll look at your site and your three closest competitors myself and send back what I'd actually do about the gap. Not a generated report, me. Whether you ever pay for anything or not.
I can do that properly for about the first ten people, so I'd rather be straight about the number than quietly stop replying.
If you'd rather skip all that and just have it running against your competitors, that's the $149. I'd rather have five customers arguing with me about the output than five hundred free accounts sitting idle.
Happy to get into the pipeline, the slop filter, the agency-to-product transition, or the pricing math in the comments. Including how it stacks up against Outrank, if you've used it.
