After the first post and some conversations, one thing is becoming clearer:
The “I waste so much time just planning where to go” angle seems to land harder than pure “here’s a nice curated bar list.”
People don’t necessarily want more recommendations, they want the decision-making and sequencing done for them.
Still very early (free version gets more usage, gift version is slower but more intentional). Testing a few small messaging changes this week based on that.
Anyone else noticed their positioning shift after the first real conversations?
That's a real signal but it's ambiguous in one direction worth checking. "Planning is exhausting" resonates with everyone who has ever planned anything, including people who will never pay you — it's an agreement statement, not a purchase intent. "Curated bars" is narrower and filters harder, which looks like weaker signal and might be better signal.
Are the two phrases pulling comparable numbers of people who then do something, or just comparable numbers who nod?
That’s a useful distinction. “Curated bars” describes what the product contains, while “planning is exhausting” speaks to the job people are actually trying to get done. I’d be interested to see whether that shift also changes who responds to the product, not just how many people respond.
Yeah, that’s the part I’m watching most closely now.
So far the “planning is exhausting” framing seems to pull in people who just want the decision-making done for them, while the pure “curated bars” angle attracts more of the “I like discovering places” type. Still very early, but the two groups feel different in how they use it.
Curious if you’ve seen positioning shifts like this change the actual user type (not just conversion) in other products.
That’s exactly the kind of distinction I was getting at. The interesting question now is whether those two groups also differ in willingness to pay or retention, not just how they respond to the messaging.