Curious if anyone else productized a workflow they kept rebuilding for clients
I've spent a lot of time in consulting rebuilding the same inbound lead path: form or webhook in, light scoring, a row in Sheets (sometimes Airtable), then a short Day 0 / 2 / 5 follow-up.
I finally packaged that as a small one-time kit — Relaykit Lead Ops Pack — mostly so I wouldn't keep rebuilding it. Importable n8n workflows, a Make map, and setup notes. $49 if it's useful to anyone; happy to just talk through the structure if you'd rather DIY.
https://buy.polar.sh/polar_cl_m4P9RPwcU9oPphQayT59a2ivzt1sqebs7lqqh4CtjL8
One question I'm still unsure on: for a kit like this, would you default to Sheets or Airtable?
(Support if needed: [email protected])
As someone running a dev agency, we see this exact pattern all the time—rebuilding the same boilerplate inbound lead automation workflows across multiple clients. Turning it into a productized kit is a great move. Regarding your question on defaulting to Sheets vs. Airtable: definitely start with Google Sheets. Almost every client already uses it or is comfortable with it, and it keeps friction extremely low for a $49 entry-level kit. Airtable is more powerful for relational data, but Sheets is universally accessible and easier to integrate as a lightweight destination.
The fact you rebuilt this repeatedly for clients is stronger evidence than the kit itself. Have buyers used it successfully without your help, or does it still need enough setup that they’re really buying implementation expertise?