Built an AI that finds incomeopportunities and managesthe hustle for you — 14 visitors later, here's what'sactually working (and what
Hey IH — building MillionAIOS, an AI system that hunts for income opportunities, runs multiple revenue streams, and coaches you through the part everyone skips: actually sticking with it.
The pitch: most wealth-building tools hedge funds use are locked behind money and access most people don't have. I wanted to see if AI could hand that same leverage to a regular person running a side income on their laptop.
Where it's at: 14 visitors so far. Only 169 made it to the pricing page. 14 signups. Organic traffic converts at 8.7% — way better than paid — which told me the landing page itself, not the offer, is the leak. One channel (BetaList, 255 visitors) sent literally zero people to pricing. That's not a pricing problem, that's a "the page didn't make the case" problem.
So the current build is a full landing page redesign — pricing visible above the fold, a free trial, money-back guarantee — because if the trial's true value never gets seen, the price never gets tested.
Would genuinely love a roast: if you landed on a page like this cold, what would make you scroll past the fold instead of bouncing?
The instrumentation point above is right, but I'd push on what happens after you fix it. Even with clean tracking, someone, maybe an AI drafting your update or dashboard copy, still has to decide how to present numbers that don't cleanly reconcile. I hit this building Alisio: the model will happily write a smooth paragraph around numbers that don't add up, because writing the paragraph is easy and flagging the inconsistency isn't its job unless you make it a rule. What worked for me wasn't better prompting, it was a check the app runs before any figure gets shown: if two numbers that should reconcile don't, neither gets stated. I'd fix that layer before the landing page, not just the tracking. A redesign built on numbers nobody's verified line up is still a redesign built on a story, not data.
Before rebuilding the page, look at what BetaList traffic actually is: people browsing for interesting tools, not people actively trying to fix their income. Zero pricing clicks from that channel might be a channel-fit problem, not a page-failure problem. On the fold itself, I'd swap the concept pitch for one real example, an actual opportunity the AI found and the dollar outcome, abstract promises about hedge-fund-grade tools read as hype, a single concrete instance reads as proof.
Great Read!
Una IA que hace eso es perfecta para quienes quieren ahorrar tiempo y recursos. No entiendo todo lo que se habla aquí, pero me parece muy interesante adquirir nuevos conocimientos con este tipo de contenido.
Before redesigning the page, I’d fix the denominator. The post says 14 visitors, 169 reached pricing, and 14 signups; those cannot all be counts from the same funnel.
Even if 14 visitors is a typo, BetaList sending zero pricing-page visits does not prove the landing page is the leak. It may be low-intent or bot traffic. Freeze the copy, log source → engaged session → pricing view → signup, and inspect that funnel before changing the offer and layout together. Right now you risk optimizing instrumentation noise.
would love to give you a ruthless roast on the hero section to see why they are bouncing, but it looks like you forgot to drop the link to the actual page! drop the url here and i'll take a look.
Fair catch — appreciate you actually doing the math instead of just reacting to the post.
You're right, those aren't from the same funnel cleanly. "169 reached pricing" and "14 signups" came from different tracking sources (page views vs. completed signups) that I hadn't reconciled against a single visitor cohort before posting. That's a real gap on my end, not a typo I can hand-wave.
And you're right on the deeper point too — zero BetaList traffic reaching pricing doesn't prove the landing page is the leak. Could just as easily be low-intent traffic or the instrumentation gap itself. I was about to redesign the page and the offer at the same time, which means if conversion moves afterward, I won't know which change did it — or whether it moved at all.
Doing what you said: freezing the copy, wiring one continuous funnel (source → engaged session → pricing view → signup), and diagnosing off real numbers before touching layout or copy again. Thanks for catching this before I spent a cycle optimizing noise.
https://millionaios-44674.polsia.app/?ref=betalist is what Betalist links to. That might explain the bounce. They're telling potential customers they're not serious enough to pay $10 for a custom domain or to hide that they're using an AI business builder to build their AI business builder. BTW there is nothing at that URL currently besides the default Polsia page so I'm unsure how they got any sign ups (or as they called them: visitors). Is Polsia managing their indiehackers account and this post too? AI slop all around...
The early numbers are interesting, especially the gap between traffic sources. Curious whether the people arriving organically are actually the same type of user you intended to build for.
Joined the waitlist. Curious to see what income streams there are.
You can also run your business idea through our free evaluation tool Firmgrove might show you thinks that you didn't think of.
Appreciate the pointer! Different angle here though — MillionAIOS isn't a one-time evaluation tool, it's an always-on system that finds opportunities and manages the revenue streams it finds, so it keeps working after the initial idea-check. Happy to compare notes if you've used both.